FACT SHEET: Climate change and drought

A drought is a period of abnormally dry weather that lasts long enough to cause serious water shortages for natural ecosystems, agriculture, and people. Climate change is projected to increase the risk and severity of drought across much of central Canada (Bonsal et. al 2024). In 2025, drought conditions were felt nation-wide, fueling Canada’s second worst wildfire season (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2025). By September 2025, about 85% of the country was abnormally dry or in drought conditions, with parts of the Maritimes experiencing their driest summer on record.

Climate change is making droughts more frequent and severe

Climate change worsens conditions in Canadian drought-prone regions and beyond

  • The southern Prairies and the interior of British Columbia are especially susceptible to drought and have seen several prolonged droughts in the past century. With climate change, areas that are currently dry are projected to become even drier (Bonsal et. al 2024).
  • Drought-affected areas are projected to steadily increase in Canada throughout this century, including under moderate emissions scenarios (Soltani et. al 2024). The Prairie provinces, southern Northwest Territories, portions of interior British Columbia, and most of Ontario are likely to face the greatest increases in frequency and severity of drought (Bonsal et. al 2024).
  • Even under the lowest emission scenario, the current 1-in-10-year drought in the southern Prairies is projected to increase to around 2–3 occurrences every 10 years (Bonsal et. al 2024).
  • Snow drought’ in key areas of western and southern Canada can have broad ripple effects. Significant snow losses in the North American Cordillera—the headwaters of major western Canadian rivers—put water supplies at risk for 86% of Canadians living in the affected basins (Sarpong et. al 2026).

Droughts are costly disasters

  • Droughts were an important factor in the recent dramatic increase in crop insurance payments in Canada, which surged from $890 million in 2018 to $4.9 billion in 2022 (Arnason 2024). 
  • Drought insurance payouts to Alberta’s farmers and agri-businesses reached a record $326.5 million in 2023, more than tripling the payouts from the 2021 drought, according to the Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (Smith 2024).
  • Due to severe drought, crop production in Saskatchewan fell by a record 47 per cent in 2021. That year, Saskatchewan was the only province to see its economy contract (-0.3 per cent). Statistics Canada reported that while “activity was up in most sectors of the economy, those gains were entirely negated by the worst drought in nearly two decades” (Statistics Canada 2022).
  • In the Abitibi region of Québec, hay producers received a record $6.8 million in compensation for the 2023 drought, more than triple the annual average (Cameron 2024).
  • Droughts limit hydroelectricity generation, cutting revenue for utilities, and making electricity more expensive for consumers (CBC News 2023).
  • In January 2024, drought conditions in both B.C. and Manitoba meant lower reservoir levels at hydroelectric facilities, forcing the two provinces to import power from other jurisdictions (Canadian Press 2024). In 2025, severe drought drove Manitoba Hydro’s operating costs $684 million over budget (Macintosh 2025).
  • Persistently low reservoir levels forced Hydro-Québec to cut its exports by more than half between 2022 and 2024. Together with less favourable market conditions, this drove an $866 million drop in revenue for the utility in 2024 alone (Hydro-Québec 2025).

Droughts threaten the health of Canadians

  • Droughts can degrade drinking water quality and increase the risk of water-borne diseases, as sluggish flows and more evaporation concentrate contaminants in water bodies and promote toxic algal blooms (Yusa et al. 2015).
  • Droughts can contribute to respiratory issues (Yusa et al. 2015) due to windblown dust from dried-out soils, exacerbating conditions such as asthma. 
  • Droughts can increase the likelihood of infection among recreational water users at times when warm weather drives engagement in water activities (Yusa et al. 2015).
  • Drought is associated with mental health issues, such as anxiety, depression, and increased risk of suicide, especially for farmers, who can experience financial and emotional stress during droughts (Ellis and Albrecht 2017).

Droughts worsen the risk of floods, wildfires and ecosystem damage

  • Droughts fuel wildfires by drying out vegetation and soils, creating highly flammable conditions. Prolonged water stress weakens trees and plants, causing them to shed leaves and needles, lose moisture, and eventually die, adding to the amount of available fuel. At the same time, hot, dry conditions lower humidity and increase the likelihood that sparks from lightning, equipment, or human activity will ignite a fire. Once fires start, low moisture allows them to spread quickly and burn more intensely, increasing the risk to communities, ecosystems, and critical infrastructure. 
  • Widespread drought conditions were a major driver of the 2025 wildfire season, which saw significant blazes in almost every province and territory and was Canada’s second-worst on record (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2025). A study in Manitoba found that low rainfall and snowpack left soil among the driest on record in early 2025, fueling the province’s rapidly spreading wildfires (Amiri et al. 2025). 
  • In 2023, prolonged multi-year drought in western Canada, and a rapidly occurring ‘flash drought’ in Ontario and Quebec were key drivers of the worst wildfire season in Canadian history (Jain et. al 2024). 
  • Drought conditions drive overnight burning, a key factor that helps small fires grow into large, active blazes (Luo et. al 2024). 
  • Drought can increase the risk of flooding. Dry conditions hurt soil quality and kill off vegetation, making soil less able to absorb water. If heavy rainfall follows a drought, water can run off more easily, which increases the risk of flooding (Bonsal et al. 2019).  
  • Droughts in northwest British Columbia, particularly during July and August when salmon are migrating to their upstream spawning areas, can cause severe and lasting damage to their populations, to ecosystems, and to the Indigenous Peoples that rely on them (Curran and Marsden 2021).

Governments can do a lot to protect Canadians from the worsening risk of droughts

Scientists have warned that the consequences of climate change will only get worse as the concentration of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere increases (IPCC 2022). Governments around the world, including Canada’s, must act immediately to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming.

Because the impacts of climate change are already here and getting worse, communities and governments must work together to adapt and prepare for the increased risk of drought today. Specific measures governments can take include:

  • Plan proactively: All orders of government can prepare for shortages by developing and implementing proactive drought response plans, such as Alberta’s comprehensive Drought Response Plan. These plans include clear strategies for managing water resources, coordinating across sectors, and protecting vulnerable communities (Government of Alberta 2024).
  • Conserve water: Water conservation can reduce the adverse impacts of droughts when supplies are low. In the short term, this can include voluntary or mandatory restrictions on water use during dry periods. Over the longer term, governments can implement policies to prevent waste, such as universal water metering and conservation-oriented pricing, reducing losses from leaks in aging distribution systems, and efficiency standards for fixtures and appliances. 
  • Protect water quality:  Increased water quality monitoring during droughts helps safeguard drinking water and protect recreational water users from adverse health effects, such as parasites and toxins (Yusa et al. 2015).
  • Strengthen agricultural resilience: Governments can increase drought resilience by improving early warning systems, such as the Canadian Drought Monitor (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2024), supporting investment in irrigation and water storage, and incentivizing the use of drought-tolerant crop varieties. 
  • Support farming communities: Strong crop insurance, disaster relief programs, and mental health supports are vital for farming families and agricultural communities coping with financial and emotional stress during droughts (Bonsal et al. 2011; Hart et al. 2011). 
  • Invest in climate research and drought management for hydroelectricity: The sector can better anticipate and manage drought by investing in climate modeling and real-time monitoring (Ouranos n.d.). BC Hydro has funded research and development to improve its forecasting and hydroclimate monitoring capabilities (BC Hydro 2022). They pair these tools with multi-year reservoir storage and an integrated provincial grid to proactively conserve water and adapt operations (Stocks 2025).

Resources

Experts available for comment and background information on this topic:

  • Ryan Ness is Director of Adaptation Research at the Canadian Climate Institute and the lead researcher on the Institute’s Costs of Climate Change series (Eastern Time, English and French).
  • Zach Carriere is Research Associate in Adaptation at the Canadian Climate Institute (Eastern Time, English).

For more information or to interview an expert, please contact: 

Claudine Brulé
Lead, Communications and External Affairs
cbrule@climateinstitute.ca
(226) 212-9883  (Eastern Time, French & English)

Krystal Northey 
Lead, Public Affairs 
knorthey@climateinstitute.ca
(226) 212-9883 (Mountain Time, English)

References 

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2024. Canadian Drought Monitor. https://agriculture.canada.ca/en/agricultural-production/weather/canadian-drought-monitor 

Amiri, Afshin, Silvio Gumiere, and Hossein Bonakdari. 2025. “A Lens on Fire Risk Drivers: The Role of Climate and Vegetation Index Anomalies in the May 2025 Manitoba Wildfires.” Earth 6(3): 88. doi:10.3390/earth6030088.

Arnason, Robert. 2024. “Crop Insurance Costs Explode.” The Western Producer, February 29. https://www.producer.com/news/crop-insurance-costs-explode/  

BC Hydro. 2022. Casting Drought: How Climate Change Is Contributing to Uncertain Weather and How BC Hydro’s Generation System Is Adapting. Vancouver: BC Hydro. https://www.bchydro.com/content/dam/BCHydro/customer-portal/documents/news-and-features/bchydro-report-casting-drought.pdf

Bonsal, Barrie, Rajesh R. Shrestha, Yonas Dibike, et al. 2020.“Western Canadian Freshwater Availability: Current and Future Vulnerabilities.” Environmental Reviews 28, no. 4 : 528–45. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0040

Bonsal, Barrie, Benita Tam, Xuebin Zhang, Guilong Li, Lisa Philps, and Robin Rong. 2024. “Do Meteorological, Agricultural, and Hydrological Indicators All Point to an Increased Frequency and Intensity of Droughts Across Canada Under a Changing Climate?” Atmosphere-Ocean 62(5): 372–90. doi:10.1080/07055900.2025.2453678.

Cameron, Daphné. 2024. “Compensations pour Pertes Agricoles: Un Milliard pour les Agriculteurs après une Année Désastreuse.” La Presse, March 21. https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/2024-03-21/compensations-pour-pertes-agricoles/un-milliard-pour-les-agriculteurs-apres-une-annee-desastreuse.php.  

Canadian Press. 2024. “Drought in Western Canada Impacting Hydropower Production as Reservoirs Run Low.” Business in Vancouver, January 29. https://www.biv.com/news/resources-agriculture/drought-western-canada-impacting-hydropower-production-reservoirs-run-low-8295183  

Caretta, M.A., A. Mukherji, M. Arfanuzzaman, R.A. Betts, A. Gelfan, Y. Hirabayashi, T.K. Lissner, J. Liu, E. Lopez Gunn, R. Morgan, S. Mwanga, and S. Supratid, 2022. Water. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 551–712, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.006.

CBC News. 2023. “Drought is causing B.C. utilities to import more power — and that will affect your bills in 2024.” December 21. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-electric-rate-changes-as-province-imports-power-1.7065802

Chiang, Felicia, Omid Mazdiyasni, and Amir AghaKouchak. 2021. “Evidence of Anthropogenic Impacts on Global Drought Frequency, Duration, and Intensity.” Nature Communications 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22314-w

Cook, Benjamin I., Justin S. Mankin, Kate Marvel, A. Park Williams, Jason E. Smerdon, and Kevin J. Anchukaitis. 2020.  “Twenty-First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios”. Earth Future 8 (6)https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019EF001461 

Curran, Deborah, and Tara Marsden. 2021. Ayookxw responding to climate change. Canadian Climate Institute. June 21. https://climateinstitute.ca/publications/ayookxw-responding-to-climate-change/ 

Ellis, Neville R., and Glenn A. Albrecht. 2017. “Climate change threats to family farmers’ sense of place and mental well-being: A case study from the Western Australian Wheatbelt”. Social Science and Medicine 175, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.009 

Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2025. “Canada’s Top 10 Weather Stories of 2025.” Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/top-ten-weather-stories/2025.html#toc2

Government of Alberta. 2024. Alberta Drought Response Plan. Environment and Protected Areas. August 14. https://www.alberta.ca/system/files/epa-alberta-drought-response-plan.pdf 

Hart, Craig R., Helen L. Berry, and Anne M. Tonna. 2011. “Improving the mental health of rural New South Wales communities facing drought and other adversities”. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 19 (5). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01225.x

Hydro-Québec. 2025. Une transition ambitieuse: Rapport Annuel 2024. https://www.hydroquebec.com/a-propos/publications-rapports/rapport-annuel.html 

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2023. Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Natural Resources Canada. 2024. “Drought.” Natural Resources Canada, April 12.https://natural-resources.canada.ca/climate-change/climate-change-impacts-forests/drought.

Nazeri Tahroudi, Mohammad. 2025. “Comprehensive Global Assessment of Precipitation Trend and Pattern Variability Considering Their Distribution Dynamics.” Scientific Reports 15(1): 22458. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06050-5.

Ouranos. n.d. “Risk of Persistent Drought on Hydroelectric Reservoirs in Quebec and Labrador: A Millennial Perspective.” Ouranos. Accessed June 15, 2026. https://www.ouranos.ca/en/projects-publications/risk-persistent-drought-hydroelectric-reservoirs-quebec-labrador-millennial

Overpeck, Jonathan T., and Bradley Udall. 2020. “Climate Change and the Aridification of North America.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(22): 11856–11858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006323117   

Sarpong, Robert, Ali Nazemi, and Amir AghaKouchak. 2026. “Creeping Snow Drought Threatens Canada’s Water Supply.” Communications Earth & Environment 7(1): 143. doi:10.1038/s43247-025-03162-8.

Smith, Madeline. 2024. “Farmers, Ranchers Worry About Coming Season Amid Drought, High Pasture Insurance Payouts.” CBC, February 26. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-farmer-rancher-drought-insurance-1.7124671.  

Soltani, Keyvan, Afshin Amiri, Isa Ebtehaj, Hanieh Cheshmehghasabani, Sina Fazeli, Silvio José Gumiere, and Hossein Bonakdari. 2024. “Advanced Forecasting of Drought Zones in Canada Using Deep Learning and CMIP6 Projections.” Climate 12(8): 119. doi:10.3390/cli12080119.

Statistics Canada. 2022. “Drought drags down Saskatchewan Economy in 2021. Statistics Canada. September 23. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/1852-drought-drags-down-saskatchewan-economy-2021  

Stocks, Carrieann. 2025. “How Climate Change Can Impact Water Scarcity and Hydropower Generation.” NS Energy, February 19, 2025. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/analysis/how-climate-change-can-impact-water-scarcity-and-hydropower-generation/

United Nations. n.d. “Water – At the Center of the Climate Crisis.” United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/water

World Weather Attribution. 2023. “Climate change more than doubled the likelihood of extreme fire weather conditions in Eastern Canada.” August 22. https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-more-than-doubled-the-likelihood-of-extreme-fire-weather-conditions-in-eastern-canada/   

Yuan, Xing, Yumiao Wang, Peng Ji, Peili Wu, Justin Sheffield, and Jason A. Otkin. 2023. “A Global Transition to Flash Droughts under Climate Change.” Science, 380(6641), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn6301 

Yusa, Anna, Peter Berry, June J. Cheng, Nicholas Ogden, Barrie Bonsal, Ronald Stewart, and Ruth Waldick. 2015. “Climate Change, Drought and Human Health in Canada.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(7): 8359–8412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120708359

Canada must build clean power faster to compete in global race for investment: report

VANCOUVER—A new report finds that clean power could be Canada’s competitive edge in the global race to attract investment in major projects, but only if the country transforms how it plans and builds its electricity systems.

The report from the Canadian Climate Institute, Power Play: How to supercharge Canada’s clean electricity advantage, finds that the country has vast potential for new low-cost clean electricity, but most provinces are not planning to build enough new supply or transmission to meet rapidly increasing demand from large industrial projects.

Wind, solar, and batteries are now among the fastest and cheapest ways to meet new electricity demand. Yet Canada largely lags its international peers in deploying these technologies at scale, held back by outdated market rules and planning frameworks that weren’t designed for the clean energy transition that is rapidly remaking electricity markets around the world. 

Without changes to federal policy, the country’s goal of doubling the size of its electricity grids—a central aim of the new national electricity strategy—is also at risk. 

ABOUT THIS RESEARCH

The Institute’s report examines the four largest provincial electricity systems—Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, and B.C.—which together account for more than 75 per cent of Canadian industrial electricity demand, and compares them with leading jurisdictions around the world. 

The analysis focuses on how Canada can grow its supply of clean electricity quickly and reliably to deliver low-cost power that unlocks global investment in large industrial projects such as mines, data centres, and manufacturing facilities consuming that power. Researchers examined how each jurisdiction approaches energy planning, grid flexibility, transmission, procurement, industrial rate design, and climate policy certainty, with an eye to increasing Canada’s competitiveness in the race for global investments. 

The report finds that current rules and incentives driving provincial electricity planning were designed for yesterday’s electricity technologies and are too cautious to build clean power at the pace and scale needed to meet rising industrial demand. Canada also lacks the federal frameworks and funding needed to support interregional transmission lines that can increase grid flexibility and avoid wasting power from solar and wind facilities already in operation. 

In addition, the research shows that Indigenous governments are critical partners in Canada’s electricity expansion—as rights-holders, major asset owners, and project proponents—and already hold equity in a substantial share of Canada’s electricity projects.  

RECOMMENDATIONS

While electricity planning largely falls within provincial jurisdiction, the report’s recommendations focus on federal action, given the national economic implications in the race to attract investment, the need for interprovincial co-ordination, and the recent call for input on Canada’s national electricity strategy. 

The report recommends the federal government: 

  • Support interprovincial electricity planning and co-ordination through a new shared framework in the near term and, later, new intergovernmental institution(s); 
  • Selectively fund and finance grid build-out for industrial projects by building on tools like the Canada Infrastructure Bank; 
  • Move forward with amended Clean Electricity Regulations to anchor long-term policy certainty for clean electricity investors, with a limited role for existing gas-fired power to meet peak demand alongside other forms of flexibility such as batteries and interties; and 
  • Prioritize grid flexibility by funding programs that incentivize industrial demand management and on-site investments in battery storage through the Clean Technology Investment Tax Credits.

The Canadian Climate Institute will publish two additional companion reports later this year that focus on recommendations for provincial governments and utilities. 

QUOTES 

“Canada has a critical opportunity to power a new era of economic growth with cheap and reliable clean electricity—but only if governments act now. The countries winning the race for investment are rapidly expanding their grids with clean, flexible power. This report shows how Canada can compete by leveraging its clean electricity advantage to secure nation-building growth in an era of global instability and trade disruption.”

— Rick Smith, President, Canadian Climate Institute

“Access to reliable, affordable clean power has been a Canadian economic advantage, but it requires action to maintain. Our analysis found that the rules and incentives governing Canada’s electricity systems are geared for yesterday’s power technologies and demand forecasts, and are holding back investments in the country’s grids and industrial sectors. The good news is that the solutions are within reach, and the federal government has the policy levers needed to help provinces put them to work.”

— Kate Harland, Research Director, Clean Growth, Canadian Climate Institute

“This new report from the Canadian Climate Institute underscores the importance of providing long-term policy certainty to attract investment in Canada’s electricity system. Wind, solar, and energy storage are affordable, modular, scalable, fast-to-deploy technologies that can create jobs and help meet growing electricity demand, but to realize this potential, the sector needs predictable and stable policy environments across jurisdictions.” 

— Vittoria Bellissimo, President and CEO, Canadian Renewable Energy Association

“The role of Indigenous Peoples in energy planning cannot be ignored. Connecting more clean power to the grid will require Indigenous partnerships across the country. Already, Indigenous Peoples are the biggest owners of electricity assets outside of Crown corporations and utilities in Canada, and building more clean power will require equity and co-ownership opportunities that recognizes the unique role Indigenous Peoples play in regional electricity planning.”

— Kwatuuma Cole Sayers, Executive Director, Indigenous Power Coalition, and Member, Canadian Climate Institute Mitigation Expert Panel

KEY FACTS

  • Since 2009, solar costs have fallen 84 per cent and onshore wind costs have dropped 56 per cent, while battery storage costs fell 27 per cent in the last year alone.
  • Failing to build enough clean power can carry a steep price tag. A recent report from Dunsky Energy + Climate Advisors found Canada could miss out on $110 to $220 billion in potential capital investment due to insufficient clean electricity supply.
  • Indigenous peoples hold equity in nearly 550 projects and roughly $260 billion in electricity infrastructure. According to the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, Indigenous ownership could further unlock $12 billion in generation and $5 billion in transmission equity. 

RESOURCES

CONTACTS

Claudine Brulé (Eastern Time)
Lead, Communications and External Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
(226) 212-9883

Krystal Northey (Mountain Time)
Lead, Public Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
(226) 212-9883

About the Canadian Climate Institute 

The Canadian Climate Institute is Canada’s leading climate change policy research organization. The Institute produces rigorous analysis, economic modelling, and in-depth research focused on incentivizing clean economic growth and low-carbon competitiveness, reducing emissions and accelerating Canada’s net zero energy transition, and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate. climateinstitute.ca

New research: Indigenous leadership is key to Canada’s climate and energy transition

June 9, 2026 | TORONTO—Four original case studies released today highlight Indigenous-led research with implications for Canada’s national priorities—from expanding and interconnecting the electricity grid, to evaluating major resource development projects.

The research by First Nations and Métis scholars and authors, presented by the Canadian Climate Institute and the Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources (CIER), is part of the Indigenous Perspectives program. Now in its sixth year, the annual program profiles Indigenous expertise and solutions in climate policy.

This year’s case studies focus on: 

  • How Gitanyow Nation developed a tool using Indigenous Laws and science to evaluate climate impacts and assert its authority over proposed development projects affecting its territories (by authors Tara Marsden/Naxginkw and Chris Joseph).
  • How the portrayal of Indigenous rights holders in corporate sustainability and climate public filings informs decision-making by investors, policymakers, and the public-at-large (by author Raylene Whitford).
  • How Métis harvesting knowledge is being disrupted at the moment it’s most needed, and why relationship with the land is essential to maintain vitally important climate data (by author Conor Kerr).

Case study authors will discuss their work in two online roundtables happening on June 22 and 23. The first roundtable will focus on Indigenous leadership in the energy transition with authors Raylene Whitford, Frank Busch and Kwatuuma Cole Sayers. The second roundtable will focus on Indigenous climate policy beyond Western metrics with authors Tara Marsden/Naxginkw and Conor Kerr.

Those interested in attending the 2026 Indigenous Perspectives roundtables on June 22 and 23 can register now and read this year’s case studies online. 

The roundtables are moderated and will include time for audience Q&A. The event will be recorded.

ABOUT THE INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVES PROGRAM

Since 2020, the Canadian Climate Institute and Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources have collaboratively led the Indigenous Perspectives program to amplify Indigenous-led climate research grounded in Indigenous knowledge systems and reciprocal relationships with lands, waters, and future generations. 

Featured case studies are selected through a competitive application process, and developed and presented through research funding and mentorship support from the presenting organizations. Program participants retain full ownership of their research, conclusions, and materials published. The views and policy recommendations presented reflect independent Indigenous-led research and analysis.

QUOTES 

“Indigenous Peoples are leading across the country in accelerating climate action, clean growth, and the energy transition. We’re thrilled to showcase these case studies and highlight Indigenous expertise leading the way forward in partnership with the Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources.”

— Rick Smith, President, Canadian Climate Institute

“These case studies bring forward Indigenous-led research that is critical to climate policy conversations in Canada and beyond. This year’s analyses reframe climate policy through Indigenous ways of knowing and relationships to the land, while offering guidance on energy systems, infrastructure, climate knowledge, and Indigenous rights.”

— Maria Shallard, Director, Indigenous Research, Canadian Climate Institute

“Climate change is happening now, all around us. Its impacts leave Indigenous Communities more vulnerable and challenge traditional ways of life such as hunting, fishing, trapping and gathering medicines and berries. The Indigenous Perspectives Case Study series amplifies the voices of Indigenous researchers to improve our shared climate and cultural realities, so we may continue to work together towards a shared vision for a sustainable future that protects lands and waters and builds sustainable communities.”

— Shianne McKay, Co-Executive Director, CIER

RESOURCES

CONTACT

To arrange an interview with the Institute or CIER about the Indigenous Perspectives program, or to speak with the authors of this year’s case studies, please contact: 

Claudine Brulé (Eastern Time)
Lead, Communications and External Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
(226) 212-9883

Krystal Northey (Pacific Time)
Lead, Public Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
226 212 9883

About the Canadian Climate Institute 

The Canadian Climate Institute is Canada’s leading climate change policy research organization. The Institute’s Indigenous Research stream develops sound climate policy that is consistent with self-determination by centering Indigenous-led research. The team pursues this work through partnerships with Indigenous-led organizations, such as the Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources, to amplify Indigenous expertise and knowledge. 

climateinstitute.ca

About the Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources

Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources (CIER) is a national Indigenous-led non-profit charitable organization that supports Indigenous people and communities to be leaders of positive environmental change, using the best of Western and Indigenous knowledge to create a world that is in balance and supports the well-being of all living things.

yourcier.org

We would like to raise our hands in gratitude to Vancity for sponsoring the 2026 Indigenous Perspectives program.

MOU with Alberta puts Canada’s commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 firmly out of reach

OTTAWA—Rick Smith, President of the Canadian Climate Institute, made the following statement in response to the Implementation Agreement for the Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understandingon industrial carbon pricing and clean electricity policy:

“The final Canada-Alberta MOU implementation agreement will put Canada’s target of net zero by 2050 well out of reach. It also means that Canada will be on path to achieve its 2030 target at a much later date, creating more than a decade of delay for needed progress. 

“Alberta is home to the biggest carbon market in the country, covering roughly a quarter of all national emissions. While the changes to the province’s industrial carbon market may improve on the status quo there, this is the lowest of bars. The MOU agreement’s unreasonable compromises on industrial carbon markets and clean electricity regulations, and the implications for weakening policies in other provinces, will undermine emissions reductions and Canada’s low-carbon competitiveness. 

“While the MOU agreement promises to make improvements to how the carbon market functions, the announced design changes will not be strong enough to fix market fundamentals and reach the intended effective market credit price by 2040. That undermines the credibility of the deal. Financial mechanisms such as carbon contracts for difference could improve long-term certainty but the design details leave a number of questions unanswered.  

“Ultimately, 2040 is too late to reach a market carbon credit price of $130 a tonne in Alberta. That is especially true given the cost to oil sands producers is cents per barrel on average. The deferred timeline on carbon pricing risks watering down industrial carbon pricing systems in other provinces, like B.C., which would otherwise be at a significant competitive disadvantage. 

“Further, the federal government’s plan to put the Clean Electricity Regulations in abeyance without any credible path forward increases policy uncertainty in Alberta and opens the door for more provinces to seek special treatment. That risks locking in more long-lived, high-emissions gas-fired power, exposing ratepayers to more volatile energy costs, and further stifling growth in Alberta’s previously thriving renewable energy sector.

“In response to the global energy shock underway, our international peers are leaning into the clean energy transition as the key to their future competitiveness, energy sovereignty, and affordability; Canada meanwhile is backing off, despite the long-term vision of growth fuelled by abundant and affordable clean electricity outlined in yesterday’s electricity strategy. 

“The Canadian Climate Institute will conduct comprehensive new modelling to assess the emissions-related implications of the full MOU agreement package in the days ahead, and we look forward to publishing that analysis to provide an informed basis for future policy development.”

RESOURCES

MEDIA CONTACTS

Claudine Brulé
(226) 212-9883
cbrule@climateinstitute.ca

ABOUT US

The Canadian Climate Institute is an independent climate policy research organization that produces rigorous research, analysis, and economic modelling, drawing on experts and leaders across the country. Our work focuses on: accelerating clean growth and low-carbon competitiveness; measuring progress in Canada’s clean energy transition; amplifying Indigenous perspectives and climate solutions; unlocking sustainable investment; and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.

Canada’s new electricity strategy points in the right direction, but sidesteps critical issues

OTTAWA—Dale Beugin, Executive Vice President of the Canadian Climate Institute, made the following statement in response to the release of the federal government’s Powering Canada Strong: A National Strategy for an Electrified Canadian Economy:  

“Canada’s new national electrification strategy is pointing in the right direction, but sidesteps critical issues about the future of the country’s electricity system. While it recognizes the need to double the size of the country’s electricity grids to shore up national competitiveness, affordability, and energy security, it offers little clarity on the role of gas power in the future. It focuses on supporting electrification across the economy, which will be essential for achieving net zero emissions, but raises more questions about the role of the Clean Electricity Regulations.

“Ultimately, the success of the strategy will depend on details of how—and how swiftly—the government follows through on expanding clean power generation, transmission, and widespread electrification. 

“Several important issues remain ambiguous or missing in the strategy: 

  • Connections to the Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding are unclear. How the federal Clean Electricity Regulations will apply in Alberta will have implications for the policy across the country. 
  • Changes to the Clean Electricity Regulations could allow additional emissions-intensive gas-powered generation that delivers reliability via peaking power, but also opens the door to long-lived, high-emissions baseload power, undermining Canada’s climate objectives. 
  • The strategy emphasizes the role of gas in affordability but underplays the growing opportunity from cleaner sources of system flexibility (such as storage, demand response, and interties) to help deliver affordable electricity rates.
  • The strategy overemphasizes nuclear power, which risks higher costs and delays in scaling up urgently-needed new power, compared to falling costs of renewables and storage. 
  • It’s unclear how the federal government will create incentives for provinces and territories to create the market conditions to scale-up electricity systems. Many important electricity policy levers are squarely in provincial jurisdiction.  
  • The strategy is silent on Saskatchewan’s efforts to bring back coal power, in opposition to federal law and despite the emissions implications and negative impacts on affordability 
  • Indigenous leadership and partnerships are critical to successful development of cleaner, bigger grids. While the strategy recognizes the importance of Indigenous rights and participation in the North, it’s imperative for governments to support and work with Indigenous partners across the country to advance reconciliation and realize the ambitions outlined in this strategy. 

“The new strategy offers a path forward to fix some persistent issues. Prioritizing the construction of ‘nation building’ grid infrastructure to connect provincial grids and grow electricity capacity is the necessary first step to keep up with existing and future demand. Investing in building skills and bolstering Canada’s ability to produce the hardware, grid components, and services this expansion would require could offer economic and local employment benefits.  

“The plan also recognizes the federal government has a constructive role to play in expanding and connecting Canada’s electricity systems: by providing policy certainty, facilitating co-ordination between provinces and territories, and leveraging federal resources and funding to support grid expansion and modernization, among other things. 

“The recent spike in prices at the pump is a timely reminder of how volatile oil prices can be. With targeted government support and careful planning, switching from fossil fuels to clean electricity in our homes, vehicles, and industries can have real affordability and energy security benefits

“Clean electricity resources already give Canada a competitive edge internationally—and that advantage will only grow as global markets continue shifting toward lower-carbon energy. Investing in maintaining and growing that edge is smart fiscal and energy policy, and is essential for Canada to make progress toward its international climate commitments. Realizing the full transformative potential of this new strategy will require meeting some of the hardest and most important policy challenges head-on. The Climate Institute will be releasing new research to help answer some of these questions in the months ahead.”

RESOURCES

MEDIA CONTACTS

Claudine Brulé (Eastern Time)
(226) 212-9883
cbrule@climateinstitute.ca

ABOUT US

The Canadian Climate Institute is an independent climate policy research organization that produces rigorous research, analysis, and economic modelling, drawing on experts and leaders across the country. Our work focuses on: accelerating clean growth and low-carbon competitiveness; measuring progress in Canada’s clean energy transition; amplifying Indigenous perspectives and climate solutions; unlocking sustainable investment; and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.

2026 Spring Economic Update confirms Canada’s commitment to climate competitiveness, with important work ahead

OTTAWA— Rick Smith, President of  the Canadian Climate Institute, made the following statement in response to the federal government’s 2026 Spring Economic Update

“Decarbonization is an enormous driver of global market trends as countries pursue economic security and stability. An historic buildout of clean electricity, and increased consumer uptake of low-emitting technologies such as electric vehicles and heat pumps, has been accelerated by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and the resulting volatility of oil and gas prices.

“This is the backdrop for the Spring Economic Update’s focus on building economic competitiveness and increasing trade. The Update’s recognition of the continuing importance of Budget 2025’s Climate Competitiveness Strategy is welcome. Following through with implementation remains the urgent priority.  

“The Climate Competitiveness Strategy explicitly committed, for example, to strengthening industrial carbon pricing. This remains critical to ensure Canada is positioned to compete and win in a global economy increasingly focused on low-carbon pathways. Stronger industrial carbon pricing can deliver coherent, robust, and co-ordinated carbon markets across Canada, aligning with the government’s goal of a unified Canadian economy. 

“Additional commitments to develop a post-2030 carbon pricing trajectory, fix the carbon pricing benchmark, and improve the backstop are all critically important as the federal government works to finalize its memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta. As the Institute’s research has shown, getting industrial carbon market design right will make or break the emission outcome of the Canada-Alberta MOU.  

“The federal government has also yet to launch its promised national electricity strategy to make good on the Prime Minister’s commitment of doubling clean electricity supply and better connecting and aligning provincial electricity grids.

“Some additional commitments, including a new electric vehicle strategy, have moved forward. The Climate Institute awaits the details of the new policy package to put Canada on a path to what the Prime Minister has promised as a goal of the equivalent of 75 per cent new car sales being electric vehicles by 2035.

“The federal government’s support for a sustainable investment taxonomy and sustainable finance conference are important contributions to ensuring Canada succeeds in attracting new investment for green and transition projects. 

“In addition, the government’s move to scale up and reorient $13 billion in international climate finance is also welcome, helping emerging economies cut emissions while opening markets for Canadian clean technologies and crowding in private investment.

“Finally, investing $6 billion over 10 years to support climate change adaptation for infrastructure and buildings, among other priorities, is a necessary and overdue measure to improve communities’ resilience. Yet a more comprehensive and sustained approach will be required in the years ahead to manage the rising costs of extreme weather and climate disruption.”

RESOURCES

CONTACT

Krystal Northey (Mountain Time)
Lead, Public Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
(226) 212-9883

About the Canadian Climate Institute 

The Canadian Climate Institute is an independent climate policy research organization that produces rigorous research, analysis, and economic modelling, drawing on experts and leaders across the country. Our work focuses on: accelerating clean growth and low-carbon competitiveness; measuring progress in Canada’s clean energy transition; amplifying Indigenous perspectives and climate solutions; unlocking sustainable investment; and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.

climateinstitute.ca

Canada-Alberta methane agreement shows promise, with success riding on equivalency details and transparency

OTTAWA—Rick Smith, President of the Canadian Climate Institute, made the following statement about the agreement-in-principle on the Canada-Alberta methane equivalency agreement:

“Today’s announcement that Canada and Alberta have reached an agreement-in-principle on reducing methane emissions is a positive step forward. The final details of the equivalency agreement, and follow-through on the commitment to independent and transparent verification of outcomes, will be critical to determine the agreement’s success. 

“Reducing methane is one of the lowest-cost emission-reduction options for the oil and gas sector and can support Canadian companies that find innovative solutions to market beyond national borders. In fact, the industry has already shown encouraging progress reducing these emissions, thanks in large part to joint federal-provincial action

“Today’s commitment to jointly select an independent third party to model and assess emissions reductions is an important approach to reinforce policy ambition and integrity, and help ensure the regulations cover the true extent of methane pollution levels from Alberta’s oil and gas sector.

“While this agreement-in-principle matches the commitment in the Canada-Alberta MOU, that commitment is a step back from Canada’s stated goal of reducing methane emissions by 75 per cent below 2012 levels by 2030. By delaying this target, Canada is giving up an estimated 53 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent of feasible and cost-effective emissions reductions over the next decade. This agreement leaves many important details to be decided, including the role of offsets, which must be carefully defined to avoid double counting.” 

“We look forward to providing further comment on the details of the equivalency agreement once it is posted for public consultation, and will work to ensure the final equivalency agreement between the two parties is rigorous, transparent and aligned with evidence and best practices to be as effective as possible.” 

RESOURCES

MEDIA CONTACTS

Claudine Brulé (Eastern Time)
(226) 212-9883
cbrule@climateinstitute.ca

Krystal Northey (Mountain Time)
(226) 212-9883
knorthey@climateinstitute.ca

ABOUT US

The Canadian Climate Institute is an independent climate policy research organization that produces rigorous research, analysis, and economic modelling, drawing on experts and leaders across the country. Our work focuses on: accelerating clean growth and low-carbon competitiveness; measuring progress in Canada’s clean energy transition; amplifying Indigenous perspectives and climate solutions; unlocking sustainable investment; and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.

Data show stronger industrial carbon pricing would cost oil sands producers just a Timbit a barrel in 2030 on average

OTTAWA — Strengthening industrial carbon markets to meet the terms of the Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) would have minimal cost impact on the oil sands sector’s bottom line, according to new research from the Canadian Climate Institute. 

Specifically, the Institute’s latest analysis of project-by-project compliance costs and profits found that oil sands producers would pay on average less than 50 cents a barrel in 2030, up from 9 cents a barrel today, if the minimum price of carbon credits rose to $130 a tonne by the end of the decade. That’s roughly equivalent to the cost of a Timbit, after accounting for inflation. 

The Institute’s 440 Megatonnes project released a new cost calculator that allows users to explore the costs or benefits that specific oil sands projects are estimated to face under current and future industrial carbon prices. It shows that the cost of industrial carbon pricing today represents less than 1 per cent of the value of a barrel of oil—0.5 per cent of the price of Western Canadian Select at C$100 per barrel. 

The new research comes in the wake of recent public comments and media reports stating that industrial carbon pricing hurts the competitiveness of Canada’s oil and gas sector—which is not supported by evidence. 

On the contrary, carbon pricing protects competitiveness by design. Programs such as Alberta’s Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) system rely on emissions thresholds that limit costs for trade-exposed industries while still encouraging emissions reductions. Firms only pay the carbon price on the portion of emissions that exceed a performance benchmark, and can make money if their emissions are below that mark by selling carbon credits on the market or banking them for future use.

The Climate Institute also examined nearly two decades of data to assess how industrial carbon pricing has impacted the competitiveness of oil sands facilities. The analysis found no statistically significant evidence of export contraction linked to carbon pricing using 17 years of provincial trade data covering 10 provinces and 19 industrial sectors, and after accounting for commodity cycles and U.S. demand, oil prices, and provincial trends. The average estimated effect was essentially zero. 

Industrial carbon pricing is the most important climate policy in Canada to reduce emissions, drive innovation, and maintain economic competitiveness, all while costing consumers next to nothing. Maintaining the planned trajectory to $130 per tonne for minimum carbon credit prices by 2030 will provide long-term certainty to the business community and help reduce carbon pollution across diverse industries. 

QUOTES 

“The evidence shows stronger industrial carbon pricing will cost oil sands companies just a Timbit a barrel by the end of the decade. It’s unclear how any project could claim to be uneconomical as a result of such a negligible cost—especially considering it makes up less than one per cent of the cost of a barrel of oil. Alberta and Canada have committed to strengthen industrial carbon markets; closing loopholes and raising the price of carbon credits are non-negotiable if this important policy aims to reduce emissions, while keeping costs low for industry.”

— Rick Smith, President, Canadian Climate Institute 

“Our new analysis and online calculator show how low the costs are for oil sands producers  from industrial carbon pricing. If carbon markets are strengthened in line with what Alberta and Canada have committed to in the MOU, industrial carbon pricing would add less than 50 cents to a barrel of oil. That’s a rounding error on balance sheets, not a competitiveness threat. If Canadian oil sands producers are truly so vulnerable to such minor costs, then they have much bigger structural competitiveness problems.” 

— Dale Beugin, Executive Vice President, Canadian Climate Institute

RESOURCES

CONTACTS

Krystal Northey 
Lead, Public Affairs
Canadian Climate Institute
(226) 212-9883

About the Canadian Climate Institute 

The Canadian Climate Institute is Canada’s leading climate change policy research organization. The Institute produces rigorous analysis, economic modelling, and in-depth research focused on incentivizing clean economic growth and low-carbon competitiveness, reducing emissions and accelerating Canada’s net zero energy transition, and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.

climateinstitute.ca

FACT SHEET: How industrial carbon pricing reduces emissions at minimal cost

Industrial carbon pricing systems are Canada’s most important policy lever for cutting carbon pollution and creating a competitive clean economy with low costs for businesses and big incentives for investment in low-carbon projects. These systems are also designed to cost next to nothing for Canadian consumers

The Canadian Climate Institute has done extensive research and modelling quantifying the effects of this policy. This fact sheet outlines how and why industrial carbon pricing has virtually no impact on the day-to-day expenses of average Canadians and keeps costs low for businesses: 

  1. Industrial carbon pricing costs Canadian consumers next to nothing—and in some cases even provides benefits.
    • Our research shows that industrial carbon pricing systems have an impact of around zero per cent on household consumption, a measure of income, in 2025. These costs are projected to remain very low and reduce consumption by just a tenth of one per cent by 2030.
    • In some cases, industrial carbon pricing—also called large-emitter trading systems—provides small net benefits for consumers, largely because of provisions in Alberta’s system that can reduce the cost of electricity.
  1. Industrial carbon pricing applies to goods sold on international markets where most price increases aren’t passed on to consumers.
    • Most companies that participate in industrial carbon pricing systems sell a significant portion of their products in other countries. 
    • About 50 per cent of the output of Canada’s large emitters is exported, and some industries export much more, which lowers costs on consumers. For example, the oil sands send closer to 80 per cent of production abroad. 
    • In addition, these exported products are sold on global commodity markets, which set the price paid and further limits the amount passed on to consumers.
  2. Industrial carbon pricing has essentially no impact on the price of food and the agricultural sector. 
    • Our modelling, done in partnership with Navius Research for the Independent Assessment of Carbon Pricing Systems shows that industrial carbon pricing has near zero overall impact on households’ spending on food. 
    • The same analysis projects that the cumulative GDP impact on the agricultural sector would be 0.08 per cent by 2030.
    • Farmers don’t directly pay the industrial carbon price and there are almost no costs to pass through the supply chain on to consumers. 
  3. Costs for consumers are virtually nothing because industrial goods have only a small impact on the price of finished consumer products.
    • Industrial carbon pricing does not apply directly to individual consumers—only to the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in the country, like oil sands facilities, steel mills, and cement plants. 
    • Industrial carbon pricing has modest or negligible increases in the cost of industrial goods such as steel, which represent only a small portion of the final cost of consumer products people buy in Canada.
    • For example, research finds that industrial carbon pricing that applies to the highest emitting steel plants in the country would still only add $0.12 to the cost of a refrigerator, and under $3 to the cost of a pickup truck.  
  4. Industrial carbon pricing is low-cost for businesses, which also limits costs passed on to consumers.
    • Industrial carbon pricing is designed to contain costs because industries only pay for emissions that exceed a specified limit, and if they outperform the limit they make money by selling credits for cash.
    • Data shows that industrial carbon pricing currently only adds an average of 9 cents per barrel to oil sands producer costs. 
    • Our research shows that if industrial carbon pricing is strengthened in line with the Canada-Alberta MOU, oil sands producers would still only be paying 50 cents per barrel in 2030—roughly the cost of a Timbit, after inflation is factored in.
    • Industrial carbon pricing imposes much lower costs on total emissions than consumer carbon pricing, around $10 or less per tonne of emissions against a carbon price of $95 per tonne.

Additional Resources

Canada off course for climate targets, with more riding on fewer policies: expert report

OTTAWA — An independent review of the federal government’s progress report on its climate plan confirms that the country requires policy reform and provincial co-operation to get closer to its climate goals while spurring innovation and building a more affordable, competitive economy. 

The Canadian Climate Institute released its independent assessment of the 2025 Progress Report on the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan, which the federal government was legally required to publish, outlining progress made on the country’s emissions goals. The Institute finds that the federal report offers a credible picture of Canada’s progress, but does not offer an adequate policy response to the growing gap between the country’s emissions and its climate targets. 

While Canada has policies to reduce emissions, the country is not on track to meet any of its climate goals, including its 2035 target and net zero emissions by 2050, according to modelling the Institute conducted with Navius Research. Instead, national emissions are on course to be roughly half way to the 2030 emissions goal. 

The report also recommends ways to accelerate Canada’s progress. Much depends on how the federal government follows through on commitments from its budget and the Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), particularly those concerning co-operative action with the provinces including industrial carbon pricing and oil and gas methane regulations.

Crucially, the Institute’s analysis shows that if the federal government gets the details right on industrial carbon pricing, and the provinces implement strengthened systems, it can roughly double the additional emissions reductions from this policy, compared to a scenario where systems largely continue as they stand today.

While better industrial climate policies will speed up Canada’s progress, they are not enough to reach the country’s goals: more policy effort will be needed. The Institute’s report includes recommendations to inform the development of additional policy options to get closer to Canada’s climate and clean economy goals. In the months ahead, the Canadian Climate Institute will be developing a more detailed assessment of potential policy options governments can implement to make deeper emissions reductions and bolster low-carbon growth. 

QUICK FACTS

  • Canada’s emissions reduction targets are: 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, 45 to 50 per cent by 2035, and net zero emissions by 2050. 
  • Canada’s 2030 target requires reducing emissions to approximately 440 megatonnes by the end of the decade. National emissions were estimated at 694 megatonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent (Mt) in 2024, or 8.5 per cent below 2005 levels. 
  • The Institute’s analysis shows Canada’s emissions are projected to be between 18 and 22 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, depending on the final design of key policies—roughly half way to the 2030 target.  
  • Estimates for 2024 show emissions from oil and gas up 9 per cent since 2005, while emissions from transport (+0.2 per cent) and buildings (-3.5 per cent) have been largely flat. Emissions from electricity (-59 per cent) and heavy industry (-11 per cent) have fallen significantly.

QUOTES

“The further Canada veers away from its climate targets, the steeper the path forward. That puts critical economic opportunities at risk—especially as our non-U.S. trading partners are rapidly decarbonizing their economies and looking for solutions. There is no shortage of policy tools that can accelerate climate progress while strengthening Canada’s economy and making life more affordable—but our assessment clearly shows that governments need to work together to put better policies in place for the country to reach its goals.”  

— Rick Smith, President, Canadian Climate Institute

“The data leave no doubt that Canada’s climate progress is off track. Fortunately, governments have options to put well-designed climate policy in place that can reduce emissions, make life more affordable, and unleash economic growth. Smart, cost-effective climate solutions can help Canada diversify trade, attract new investment, and make the economy stronger and more resilient in the face of an uncertain future.”

— Dave Sawyer, Principal Economist, Canadian Climate Institute

RESOURCES

MEDIA CONTACTS

Claudine Brulé (Eastern Time)
(226) 212-9883
cbrule@climateinstitute.ca 

Krystal Northey (Mountain Time)
(226) 212-9883
knorthey@climateinstitute.ca 

About the Canadian Climate Institute

The Canadian Climate Institute is Canada’s leading climate change policy research organization. The Institute produces rigorous analysis, economic modelling, and in-depth research focused on incentivizing clean economic growth and low-carbon competitiveness, reducing emissions and accelerating Canada’s net zero energy transition, and making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate.